Weaponized Victimhood: How the Media Manufactures US-Immigration Horror Stories
I moved to the United States in 2008 and have been continuously exposed to the American visa and immigration system ever since. I also help many clients relocate to the U.S.—some for work, some as investors, some to start over. So I see first-hand what really happens at the border, in visa processing, and in ICE custody.
And while I won't claim the system is always pleasant or efficient—it isn't—I can say one thing with absolute confidence:
I have never, not once, seen an EU citizen treated even remotely like the man described in this Guardian article.
Yes, people get sent back at the airport if something’s wrong with their paperwork. That happens. But 100 days in shackles for a three-day overstay? No. That’s not how it works. That’s not how it has ever worked in any case I’ve seen in nearly two decades of involvement.
So my message to you is clear:
If you're visiting the U.S. for a holiday or for business, and you're not committing visa fraud, overstaying recklessly, or getting arrested—you have nothing to worry about. Don’t get distracted by the hysteria.
The Hysteria in Question
On July 15, 2025, The Guardian published a breathless exposé titled “Irish tourist jailed by ICE for overstaying by three days: ‘Nobody is safe’”
This is not journalism. It is activist fiction disguised as news.
According to the article, a 35-year-old Irish tech worker named “Thomas” was swept up by a heartless immigration system and imprisoned for 100 days after a mere three-day overstay on the U.S. Visa Waiver Program. He was “shackled,” starved, humiliated, and forgotten—despite doing everything right. He even claims he tried to notify DHS in advance, had medical paperwork, and signed his own deportation order.
Yet, inexplicably, ICE kept him locked up for over three months.
Sounds outrageous, right?
But scratch the surface, and the narrative crumbles.
The Cracks in Thomas’ Story
Let’s start with the basics. Under the Visa Waiver Program (VWP), visitors from countries like Ireland can enter the U.S. for up to 90 days without a visa. But there’s a catch: if you overstay by even a single day, you void your VWP privileges and can no longer enter the U.S. without a visa.
Thomas admits he overstayed—but says it was “just three days” and due to a medical emergency. Supposedly he “tore his calf” and had a doctor’s note saying he shouldn’t fly due to risk of blood clots.
This is framed as a get out of jail free card.
But here’s the truth: there is no legal procedure to extend a VWP stay for medical reasons unless you file a formal application for parole in place or request deferred action—neither of which Thomas claims to have done. Instead, he says he filled out some DHS online forms and contacted embassies. That’s not a process—it’s wishful thinking.
Let’s also talk about the torn calf muscle excuse. According to Thomas, this minor injury somehow rendered him medically unfit to fly for two to three months. Come on. A torn calf muscle? And you’re grounded for nearly a quarter of a year? Unless you’re at extreme risk for thrombosis or had multiple complications, this is just not how real-life travel restrictions work. Sure, in the most cautious of cases a doctor might suggest delaying a long-haul flight—but three months? That’s not a medical necessity, that’s a convenient excuse. And even if it were genuine, the law still requires you to notify USCIS properly—not just “fill out online forms” and hope for understanding.
More importantly, ICE doesn’t detain people for 3-day overstays—especially not Irish citizens with clean records.
Unless there’s more to the story.
The Missing Charge: False Imprisonment
Buried deep in the article is the real trigger: Thomas was arrested by Savannah police for false imprisonment after a hotel conflict with his girlfriend. She now claims she never wanted him charged and that he was “having a mental health episode.” But police don’t charge people with false imprisonment—a serious felony—without probable cause.
Let’s be blunt: this wasn’t just a misunderstanding.
False imprisonment means one person prevented another from leaving a space against their will. It’s often linked to domestic violence. So what actually happened in that hotel room? We’re not told. Conveniently, neither Thomas nor his girlfriend—who also uses a fake name in the story—go into detail.
But once arrested, Thomas was flagged for overstay and turned over to ICE.
This is standard operating procedure—not some dystopian injustice.
Why Was He Really in the U.S. for So Long?
Here’s another hole in the narrative: Thomas claims he was just visiting his girlfriend. But he’d already been in the U.S. for nearly three months, and after being detained, stayed another three.
So, six months in the U.S.—on a visa waiver—without work? Without income? On vacation?
Unlikely.
The article fails to ask how he was supporting himself. Was he working remotely for a European company? That’s illegal on the VWP. Was he being paid in the U.S.? That’s a violation of immigration law and a valid reason to be placed in removal proceedings.
But again, none of this is explored. Because the victimhood narrative demands simplicity.
Brown-Stained Underwear and Media Manipulation
The Guardian is a master of emotional manipulation. They don’t present facts—they manufacture sympathy.
Thomas doesn’t just suffer. He’s humiliated. He’s starved. His jumpsuit has “bloodstains.” His underwear has “brown stains.” He doesn’t see the sky for weeks. Guards throw his medication on the floor like he’s an animal.
The goal? To bypass your logic and hit your gut.
None of these claims are verified. No ICE or BoP official is quoted in rebuttal. There are no documents, no records, no FOIA requests—just a one-sided, sob-saturated monologue.
Even his lawyer offers no real substance.
This isn’t journalism. It’s theater.
A Pattern of Performative Journalism
This isn’t a one-off. Stories like this are everywhere in the mainstream immigration beat:
A British tourist deported for having WhatsApp messages about babysitting. Turns out, she was actually there to work.
A Canadian student detained for “nothing,” until it emerged she lied about her course enrollment.
A German activist banned from the U.S. after tweeting about protests—never mind her public calls to disrupt infrastructure.
These stories follow a formula:
Simplify the facts: Paint the subject as blameless, minimize legal violations.
Lean on emotion: Describe suffering in visceral, unverifiable terms.
Blame Trump: Regardless of year, detail, or legal precedent.
Include anonymous sources: “Out of fear,” no one is ever named.
Reference past horrors: Guantánamo, “cages,” slop food, brown people deported to war zones.
Omit real questions: Prior immigration violations? Unauthorized work? Visa fraud?
This is propaganda, not reporting.
Why the Media Keeps Doing It
Because it sells.
Stories of weeping foreigners mistreated by a cold bureaucratic system generate outrage, shares, and traffic. They validate pre-existing beliefs about America being cruel, Trump being evil, and borders being unjust.
They also reinforce a political agenda: the erasure of immigration enforcement altogether.
Make no mistake: the goal isn’t to reform the system. It’s to delegitimize the idea of any immigration control.
The narrative goes: if even a white Irish tourist can be jailed, then no one is safe. Therefore, borders must be open, ICE must be abolished, and immigration law must be treated as optional.
What the Guardian Won’t Tell You
Let’s say Thomas had entered Germany under a short-term visa, overstayed, got arrested for false imprisonment, and had no work permit.
Would Germany detain him?
Yes.
Would they ban him for 10 years?
Almost certainly.
Would anyone write a weepy story about it?
Only if the roles were reversed.
The U.S. enforces its laws like every other sovereign nation.
You overstay, you get banned.
You lie, you get deported.
You get arrested, you face consequences.
Why This Matters
This isn’t just about Thomas. It’s about a media complex weaponizing isolated cases to erode public confidence in law and order. These stories are used to:
Attack any effort to enforce immigration law
Undermine the legitimacy of borders
Portray Western democracies as oppressive
Push open-borders ideology through “human interest” fluff
And it’s working. Polls show growing confusion, especially among young people, about whether countries even should enforce their borders.
Final Thoughts
Before we close:
Let’s be clear—I don’t know Thomas. I have no access to his immigration file, arrest record, or any information beyond what The Guardian has chosen to publish. This article is not a personal attack, but a critical response to the media narrative, based on my own professional experience helping dozens of clients navigate the U.S. immigration system.
Now, back to the bigger picture.
The story of “Thomas” is almost certainly not what it appears.
There’s more to his arrest, more to his immigration history, and more to his conduct while in detention than The Guardian wants you to know. But the facts are irrelevant to the narrative. What matters is the performance.
Brown underwear, Guantánamo, and the tearful girlfriend?
All part of the script.
It’s time we demand better.
Not because we don’t care about real abuse—but because real abuse deserves real journalism, not clickbait fiction wrapped in slogans.
Want to push back on this media manipulation?
Start by calling it what it is: activist fiction.
Thinking About a Move to the U.S.?
If you're planning to visit, invest, or move to the U.S.—whether as a tourist, business traveler, or entrepreneur—don't be misled by media hysteria. The American immigration system has its flaws, but it is still one of the most rules-based and navigable in the world, especially for EU citizens.
I’ve helped dozens of clients successfully relocate or set up operations in the U.S., and I offer practical, experience-based guidance rooted in reality—not Guardian fairytales.
👉 Book a confidential consultation
Let’s make your U.S. journey a successful one—minus the fearmongering.
